- AIRPORT UTILITY 5.6 FOR MOUNTAIN LION MAC OS X
- AIRPORT UTILITY 5.6 FOR MOUNTAIN LION DRIVER
- AIRPORT UTILITY 5.6 FOR MOUNTAIN LION MAC
Instead, Mavericks now forced all Contacts and Calendar syncing through Apple’s iCloud service.Īs long time Mac aficionados, we cannot help but question whether Apple itself has inadvertently begun to grow into the behemoth it pictured Microsoft to be when they first came out in a big way with their infamous 1984 advertisement?Ĭome on Apple… bring back support for all the Airports we still have proudly installed and working around our homes and offices… they are things of beauty that are too good to dispose.
AIRPORT UTILITY 5.6 FOR MOUNTAIN LION MAC OS X
A good example of Apple employing the age old ‘bait and switch’ ploy using new software as the inducement, is best exemplified when Mac OS 10.9 Mavericks was offered completely free.įor most, it was only after the giddy excitement of receiving a spanking new Mac OS X for nothing simmered down that they realised that they were trapped without an easy option to revert to earlier Mac OS 10.8 Mountain Lion after discovering that Apple had removed the ability to locally sync their iOS devices’ Contacts and Calendars.
AIRPORT UTILITY 5.6 FOR MOUNTAIN LION DRIVER
This seems to be the trend and main driver that Apple has been using and is continuing to use to push their user base in the direction that they want. This effectively, left Mac users with little choice other than (1) not updating their Mac OS X beyond 10.7 Lion because Airport Utility 5.6 cannot be installed on any Mac OS later than Lion or (2) replacing all their existing ‘legacy’ Apple wireless access points and routers with their new incarnations:ĭespite the internet being awash with pleas and petitions for Apple to re-incorporate communication between Airport Utility and legacy Airport devices, it appears obvious that Apple does not seem keen to comply and is using its software to push its user base forward.
However, it is with great disappointment that we report that since 2011, either by a deliberate move or an oversight, Apple has dropped support for a vast range of its previous Apple Airport devices.Īirport Utility 5.6 is the last version of Airport Utility that maintained support for Apple Airport Snow, Airport Extreme built prior to January 2007 and 1st generation Express. All subsequent versions of Airport Utility no longer communicated with the above mentioned models of Apple wireless access points and routers.
Since the first Mac OS 10.0, Cheetah, up until Mac OS 10.7 Lion, Apple has meticulously ensured that all versions of their Airport Utility remained backward compatible to all their previously produced range of Apple Airport devices. This formed a perfect union, where Apple Airport devices were incomplete without Airport Utility.
The Airport Utility has traditionally been located in the /Applications/Utility/ folder across each Mac OS X release. Once again, thank you to those who offered recommendations and even code, but I intend to keep the Launcher as a separate application unless I somehow find myself in a position where Apple authorizes redistribution of their software (which is highly, highly unlikely), then I would create a standalone version of AirPort Utility 5.6.1 which would not need the companion application and I would sign the application as an identified developer.At time of writing the Airport Utility 6.3.2 (6.3.1 on Mac OS 10.8.5 Mountain Lion) is the latest version of the main administration tool that enables Mac users to communicate with their Apple wireless access points and routers. The reason for this is simple: I want users (if they would prefer) to be able to acquire the binary directly from Apple or one of their older machines and be able to use that unaltered binary with the Launcher. While I am thankful for this input and proffered help, I intentionally created the Launcher application as a separate application, instead of modifying the AirPort Utility 5.6.1 binary. I have had a number of people contact me (via comments or the contact form) and variously ask why I did not create a single application, recommend how I could create a single application, or offer me an example of a single-application version.
0 kommentar(er)
